Flip, move, tweet: a blended course design for different learning environments in urban planning, sustainability, and climate change university courses

Abstract

While much academic work has focused on how a singular teaching practice impacts student engagement and learning, synergies among innovative teaching practices have largely been ignored by the academic community. I seek to address this gap by proposing a new blended course design and examine the impact three innovative teaching practices (flipped class, movement, and twitter) combined had on ten undergraduate students taking an urban planning course focused on sustainability and climate resilience. I explore advantages and disadvantages of this course design through pre- and post-diagnostics, audio and video recordings, tweets, assignments, student feedback, and personal reflection. Because students adapt to their learning environments and showed learning gains especially in environments they had not been taught in before, I conclude that students need to learn in the places they ultimately work.

References

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Anderson, J. A., & Adams, M. (1992). Acknowledging the learning styles of diverse student populations: Implications for instructional design. New directions for teaching and learning, 1992(49), 19-33.

Aspden, E. J., & Thorpe, L. P. (2009). Where Do You Learn? Tweeting to Inform Learning Space Development. Educause Quarterly, 32(1).

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day: ISTE, ACSD.

Berrett, D. (2012). How 'Flipping' the Classroom Can Improve the Traditional Lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19 February 2012.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta.

Boswell, B. B., & Mentzer, M. (1995). Integrating Poetry and Movement for Children with Learning and-or Behavioral Disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31(2), 108-113.

Cochrane, T. (2010). Twitter tales: Facilitating international collaboration with mobile web 2.0. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future (pp. 195-205). Sydney Proceedings ascilite.

Corbeil, J. R., & Corbeil, M. E. (2011). The birth of a social networking phenomenon. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Educating Educators with Social Media (Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education, Volume 1) (pp. 13-32). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Day, J. A., & Foley, J. D. (2006). Evaluating a web lecture intervention in a human-computer interaction course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(4), 420-431.

DeCosta, M., Clifton, J., & Roen, D. (2010). Collaboration and Social Interaction in English Classrooms. English Journal (High school edition), 99(5), 14.

Doyle, T., & Zakrajsek, T. (2011). Learner-centered Teaching: Putting the Research on Learning Into Practice: Stylus Publishing (VA).

Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the Night Away: Using Twitter to Enhance Social Presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129.

ELI Publications. (2012). 7 Things You Should Know About Flipped Classrooms. Educause Quarterly, February.

Flanagan, J. R., Vetter, P., Johansson, R. S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2003). Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Current Biology, 13(2), 146-150.

Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17.

Ha, I., & Kim, C. (2014). The Research Trends and the Effectiveness of Smart Learning. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/537346.

Helgeson, J. (2011). 4 Simple Ways to Add Movement in Daily Lessons. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(2), 80-84.

Hicks, A., & Graber, A. (2010). Shifting paradigms: teaching, learning and Web 2.0. Reference Services Review, 38(4), 621 - 633.

Hillman, C. H., M.b. Pontifex, M. B., Raine, L. B., Castelli, D. M., Hall, E. E., & Kramer, A. F. (2009). The Effect of Acute Treadmill Walking on Cognitive Control and Academic Achievement in Preadolescent Children. Neuroscience 159(3), 1044-1054.

Holmes, C., Hermann, K., & Kozlowski, K. (2014). Integrating Web 2.0 Technologies in Educational and Clinical Settings: An Isomorphic Perspective. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(1-2), 65-80.

Honigfeld, A., & Dunn, R. (2009). Learning-style responsive approaches for teaching typically performing and at-risk adolescents. Clearing House, 82(5), 220-224.

Ivry, R. B., & Fiez, J. A. (2000). Cerebellar contributions to cognition and imagery. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 999-1011). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Jensen, E. (2000). Moving with the Brain in Mind. The Science of Learning, 58(3), 34-37.

Jensen, E. (2005a). Movement and Learning Teaching with the Brain in Mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Jensen, E. (2005b). Teaching with the Brain in Mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Junco, R., Heibergert, G., & Loken, E. (2010). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (in press).

Kamruzzaman, M. (2014). Development of an integrated GIS and land use planning course: impacts of hybrid instructional methods. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(3), 323-347.

Kassens-Noor, E. (2012). Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: the case of sustainable tweets. Journal of Active Learning in Higher Education 13(1), 67-79.

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, 1, 227-247.

Kvavik, R. B., & Caruso, J. B. (2005). ECAR study of students and information technology, 2005: Convenience, connection, control, and learning. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.

Lengel, T., & Kuczala, M. (2010). The Kinesthetic Classroom: Teaching and Learning through Movement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

McKinney, K., & Heyl, B. (Eds.). (2008). Sociology Through Active Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE/Pine Forge Press.
Medina, J. (2008). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and school. SEattle, WA: Pear Press.

Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: a strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481.

Pratt, D. D. (2002). Good Teaching: One Size Fits All? In J. Ross-Gordon (Ed.), An Up-date on Teaching Theory. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Prestridge, S. (2014). A focus on students’ use of Twitter – their interactions with each other, content and interface. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15, 101-115.

Rheingold, H. (2010). Attention and Other 21st-Century Social Media Literacies. Educause Review (1527-6619), 45(5), 14.

Rheingold, H., & Weeks, A. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: Mit Press.

Richardson, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful Web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Roberts , G. (2005). Technology and Leaning Expectations of the Net Generation. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the Net Generation (pp. 3.1-3.7): Educause

Saeed, N., & Sinnappan, S. (2011). Adoption of Twitter in higher education - a pilot study. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions (pp. 1115-1120): Proceedings ascilite.

Shabgahi, S. L., Shah, N. A. K., & Cox, A. M. (2013). A comparative review of research literature on microblogging use and risk in organizational and educational settings. Online Communities and Social Computing, 8029, 174-181.

Shoval, E. (2011). Using mindful movement in cooperative learning while learning about angles. Instructional Science, 39(4), 453-466.

Stephansen, H. C., & Couldry, N. (2014). Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: a ‘small data’approach. Information, Communication & Society, DOI:10.1080/1369118X.1362014.1902984.

Sweeney, T. (2012). The ACCE 2012 Study Tour: Reflections and Reoccurring Themes. Australian Educational Computing, 7(1), 7-11.

Wankel, C. (2009). Management education using social media. Organization Management Journal, 6(4), 251-263.

Wells, S. J. (2013). Moving Through the Curriculum: The Effect of Movement on Student Learning, Behavior, and Attitude. Retrieved 3 December, 2013, from http://www.smcm.edu/educationstudies/pdf/rising-tide/volume-5/Wells.pdf

Yelle, L. E. (1979). The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sciences, 10(2), 302-328.
Published
2016-01-22
How to Cite
. Flip, move, tweet: a blended course design for different learning environments in urban planning, sustainability, and climate change university courses. International Journal for Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, jan. 2016. ISSN 2472-5161. Available at: <http://ejournals.library.gatech.edu/ijsotel/index.php/ijsotel/article/view/7>. Date accessed: 24 sep. 2017.
Section
Articles

Keywords

blended course design; twitter; movement; active learning; experiential learning, small classes