The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Student Performance: An Action Research Study

Abstract

This study analyzed the effectiveness of an alternate pedagogical approach in the form of standards-focused project-based learning (PBL) teaching model in psychology classes.  Both the control and experimental groups initially adopted a negative attitude when presented with an alternate method of learning.  They viewed the group project as an unnecessary task although the literature contradicts their initial perception.  Data analyzed found that the experimental group that engaged the project and took responsibility for the learning of their peers scored significantly higher on the multiple-choice exam when compared to the control group.  No significance was found in the second experimental group where majority of the students did their part, but did not report feeling a sense of responsibility for the learning of their peers. Key indicators for higher academic performance were: 1) high self-efficacy; 2) high level of perceived control; and 3) growth mindset.

References

Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, learning, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43. doi:10.1080/00098650903505415

Biggs, J.B., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 71(1). 133-149.

Brown, J. (2006). New learning environments for the 21st century: Exploring the edge. Change, 38(5), 18-24.

Capella University. (2012). Action research paradigm protocol. Retrieved from https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/ELM8102/ actionResearchModel/ actionResearch_wrapper.asp

Daly, A. L., & Pinot de Moira, A. (2010). Students' approaches to learning and their performance in the extended project pilot. Curriculum Journal, 21(2), 179-200. doi:10.1080/09585176.2010.480839

De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 105(3). 861-880.

Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: NY: Ballantine Books.

Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327-341.

Green, S. B. & Salkind, N. J. (2008). Using SPSS for windows and macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Harlen, W., & Deakin Crick, R. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning (EPPI-centre review, version 1.1). London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.

Herr, K. & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lietz, P., & Matthews, B. (2010). The effects of college students’ personal values on changes in learning approaches. Research in higher education, 51(1), 65-87. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9147-6
Lieux, E. M. (1996). A comparative study of learning in lecture versus problem-based learning. About Teaching 50(1), 25-27.

Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning for middle and high school teachers (2nd ed.). Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.

Maurer, R. (2014). One small step can change your life: The kaizen way. New York, NY: Workman Publishing Co, Inc.

Michalski, R. L. & Shackelford, T. K. (2010). Evolutionary personality psychology: Reconciling human nature and individual difference. Personality & Individual Differences, 48(5), 509-516. Doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.10.027

Newell, R. J. (2003). Passion for learning: How project-based learning meets the needs of 21st – century students. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Nielsen, J. D., Du, X. Y., & Kolmos, A. A. (2010). Innovative application of a new PBL model to interdisciplinary and intercultural projects. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 47(2), 174-188.

Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L. (2000). College studying. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. III, p. 645-666). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Perry, R. P. (1991). Perceived control in college students: Implications for instruction in higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 7, p. 1-56). New York, NY: Agathon Press.

Phan, H. (2010). Students' academic performance and various cognitive processes of learning: an integrative framework and empirical analysis. Educational Psychology, 30(3), 297-322. doi:10.1080/01443410903573297

Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies In Higher Education, 28(1), 37-48.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20.

Shellman, S. M., & Turan, K. (2006). Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR simulation. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 19-32.

Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (2002). Active reading at the college level. In C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (365-379). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Simpson, M. L., Stahl, N. A., & Francis, M. (2004). Reading and learning strategies: recommendations for the 21st century. Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), 2-32.

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2010). Teach as you preach: The effects of student-centred versus lecture-based teaching on student teachers' approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 43-64. doi:10.1080/02619760903457818

Stupnisky, R., Renaud, R., Perry, R., Ruthig, J., Haynes, T., & Clifton, R. (2007). Comparing self-esteem and perceived control as predictors of first-year college students’ academic achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 10(3), 303-330. doi:10.1007/s11218-007-9020-4

Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60.

Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, W. D. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19-41.
Published
2016-01-22
How to Cite
. The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Student Performance: An Action Research Study. International Journal for Scholarship of Technology Enhanced Learning, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, jan. 2016. ISSN 2472-5161. Available at: <http://ejournals.library.gatech.edu/ijsotel/index.php/ijsotel/article/view/5>. Date accessed: 24 nov. 2017.
Section
Articles

Keywords

Project-Based Learning, Active Learning, curriculum development